Evaluation and comparison of regional strategies is an interesting scientific task and an important tool for identifying best practices and improving the quality of strategy in general. By what parameters should strategies be evaluated, how do these parameters and the criteria for their evaluation change over time? Is it possible to compare strategies adopted at different times? Compare with each other or with the "standard"?.
There are many questions, which calls into question the very possibility of rating.
It is proposed to listen to three reports on three strategies from the regions, and then listen to three experts, asking them to try to rank these three strategies, formulating evaluation criteria.
Organizers: Government of St. Petersburg
Any registered Forum participant can leave proposals for inclusion in draft Forum recommendations (upper right button Proposal).
Zuban Violetta, МИНЭКОНОМРАЗВИТИЯ И ВНЕШНИХ СВЯЗЕЙ АО. Vice minister
Ponomareva Svetlana, Department of Strategic Planning and Improvement of Management Processes of Vologda Oblast Government. Head of Department of Strategic Planning and Improvement of Management Processes of Vologda Oblast Government
Dozhdikov Kirill, Department of Economic Development of the Lipetsk region. Head of the Economic Development Department
Starkova Lyudmila, Committee for Economic Policy and Strategic Planning of St. Petersburg. Deputy Chairman of the Committee
Klimanov Vladimir, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. Director of the Regional Policy Center, Institute of Applied Economic Research, RANEPA
Krasnikova Tatyana, Scientific Research LLC. Executive Director
If you want to leave proposals for inclusion in draft recommendations, fill in the fields below.
XXI All-Russia Forum of Strategic Planning Leaders ©